Abstract
Following publication, the journal received criticisms regarding the rationale of this study and the plausibility of its central conclusions. Expert advice was obtained, and the following issues were determined to undermine confidence in the reliability of the study. The in vitro model does not support the main conclusion of the paper that Rhus Tox reduces pain. The qualitative and quantitative composition of the Rhus Tox extract is unknown. Figures 1G and 1H are duplicates; and figures 1I and 1J are duplicates. The majority of experimental points reported in figure 3 panel A are duplicated in figure 3 panel B. The collection, description, analysis and presentation of the behavioural data in Figure 3 is inadequate and cannot be relied upon. As a result the editors are retracting the Article. The authors do not agree with the retraction.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 8641 |
| Journal | Scientific reports |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Dec 1 2019 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Retraction Note: Ultra-diluted Toxicodendron pubescens attenuates pro-inflammatory cytokines and ROS- mediated neuropathic pain in rats (Scientific Reports, (2018), 8, 1, (13562), 10.1038/s41598-018-31971-9)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS