Rules and Resemblance: Their Changing Balance in the Category Learning of Humans (Homo sapiens) and Monkeys (Macaca mulatta)

Justin J. Couchman, Mariana V.C. Coutinho, J. David Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In an early dissociation between intentional and incidental category learning, Kemler Nelson (1984) gave participants a categorization task that could be performed by responding either to a single-dimensional rule or to overall family resemblance. Humans learning intentionally deliberately adopted rule-based strategies; humans learning incidentally adopted family resemblance strategies. The present authors replicated Kemler Nelson's human experiment and found a similar dissociation. They also extended her paradigm so as to evaluate the balance between rules and family resemblance in determining the category decisions of rhesus monkeys. Monkeys heavily favored the family resemblance strategy. Formal models showed that even after many sessions and thousands of trials, they spread attention across all stimulus dimensions rather than focus on a single, criterial dimension that could also produce perfect categorization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)172-183
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • categorization
  • comparative cognition
  • family resemblance
  • monkeys
  • rules

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rules and Resemblance: Their Changing Balance in the Category Learning of Humans (Homo sapiens) and Monkeys (Macaca mulatta)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this