Abstract
This article analyzes the artwork of two seemingly distant contemporary artists - Toomas Altnurme and Cao Jun - elucidating their creative processes through the theoretical frameworks of Martin Heidegger, Sigmund Freud, and Henri Bergson. In Section 1, I offer reasons for a side-by-side examination of Altnurme's and Jun's art. In my discussion of Altnurme's art in Section 2, I argue that his process exemplifies Heidegger's view that artists must abnegate themselves in order for their creations to come into being. In Section 3, I elucidate Jun's painting in its power to decenter the usual, object-oriented, circumspection of the mind. I ground my analyses in Freud's concept of dream logic. Freud's work on dreams allows me to approach Jun's creative process as a work of translation whereby the artist translates the preconscious elements into images that we - the audience - then see on canvas. In Section 4, where I offer a comparative examination of both artists, I rely on Bergson's articulation of the importance of intuition in order to show that both Altnurme and Jun create artworks that disclose to us the non-objective dimension of life wherein action or process and possibility take precedence over objectively existing things.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 20240003 |
Journal | Open Philosophy |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 1 2024 |
Keywords
- dream-logic in art
- freedom
- Henri Bergson
- intuition
- Martin Heidegger
- multiculturalism
- nature
- Sigmund Freud
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy