Abstract
This study investigated the effects of direct and indirect WCF on students' revision accuracy as well as on new pieces of writing over time. Intermediate level pre-faculty university students were divided randomly into four groups: direct, underlining only, underlining metalinguistic, and a control group. They produced two texts from two different picture prompts and revised these over a two-week period. They also produced two new texts three and four weeks after the last treatment. Both WCF significantly reduced learner errors in subsequent revision tasks. All three treatment groups also made significant reduction of errors after 3 weeks of CF treatment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 68-84 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Language Teaching Research Quarterly |
| Volume | 13 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- Comprehensive corrective feedback
- Direct and indirect feedback
- Focused feedback
- Unfocused feedback
- Written corrective feedback
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Should Feedback be Direct or Indirect? Comparing the Effectiveness of Different Types of WCF on L1 Arabic Writers' Use of English Prepositions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS