Simple and complex motor processing in chronic tic disorders

Kieron O'Connor, Herawaty Sebajang, Emmanuel Stip

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The hypotheses that tic disorded subjects would show greater difficulty than normal controls in initiating complex actions and suppressing automated/ballistic movements were tested using a 'countermanding paradigm'. Eleven tic subjects recruited prior to a cognitive-behaviroal tic management program, and eleven age, sex, and scholatically matched neuropsychiatrically screened nontic normal controls, were administered who replications of 52 trials of a computerized 'traffic light' test. In this test a series of three traffic lights indicated ready-go or ready-go-stop for either a complex controlled or automated response sequence. GO time and STOP time were measured over four conditions presented in random sequence (ready-go [complex]), ready-go [simple]), ready-go-stop [complex]) ready-go-stop [simple]). Results indicated that tic subjects took longer than controls to inhibit both complex and automated responses, but whereas the control subjects showed slower GO reaction times for the complex response, the tic subjects showed no difference between conditions. The tic subjects also showed no practice effects over replications. The results support an elevated level of motor activation in the tic group and a difficulty, for this group, to inhibit but not to initiate and execute an action.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-215
Number of pages5
JournalBrain and Cognition
Volume40
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1999
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Simple and complex motor processing in chronic tic disorders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this