Abstract
Background
Water insecurity affects over 2.2 billion people globally and is projected to impact up to
2.4 billion additional people by 2050 due to climate change. While central to WASH
frameworks in global health, its psychosocial dimensions, such as mental health,
gender-based violence, displacement, and livelihood loss, remain underexamined in
social work. Despite growing evidence, social work’s engagement with water security is
limited and poorly defined. This review will synthesize existing literature to assess
current practice and identify gaps in knowledge and intervention.
Methods
This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMAScR guidelines.
We will search seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO,
Social Work Abstracts, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, GreenFILE) from 2000 to
present, along with targeted grey literature searches. The 2000 start date aligns with
the UN Millennium Development Goals and IPCC Third Assessment Report. Two
independent reviewers will screen all titles, abstracts, and full texts using predefined
inclusion criteria. Data will be extracted using a standardized form and analysed using
descriptive numerical analysis and qualitative thematic synthesis.
Discussion
This review will provide the first comprehensive mapping of social work interventions
addressing water insecurity globally, informing evidence-based practice guidelines,
curriculum development, policy integration, and research priorities. Findings will be
directly relevant to achieving SDG 6 targets on universal water access.
Registration: Open Science Framework (OSF) registration DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/GKSFZ
Water insecurity affects over 2.2 billion people globally and is projected to impact up to
2.4 billion additional people by 2050 due to climate change. While central to WASH
frameworks in global health, its psychosocial dimensions, such as mental health,
gender-based violence, displacement, and livelihood loss, remain underexamined in
social work. Despite growing evidence, social work’s engagement with water security is
limited and poorly defined. This review will synthesize existing literature to assess
current practice and identify gaps in knowledge and intervention.
Methods
This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMAScR guidelines.
We will search seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO,
Social Work Abstracts, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, GreenFILE) from 2000 to
present, along with targeted grey literature searches. The 2000 start date aligns with
the UN Millennium Development Goals and IPCC Third Assessment Report. Two
independent reviewers will screen all titles, abstracts, and full texts using predefined
inclusion criteria. Data will be extracted using a standardized form and analysed using
descriptive numerical analysis and qualitative thematic synthesis.
Discussion
This review will provide the first comprehensive mapping of social work interventions
addressing water insecurity globally, informing evidence-based practice guidelines,
curriculum development, policy integration, and research priorities. Findings will be
directly relevant to achieving SDG 6 targets on universal water access.
Registration: Open Science Framework (OSF) registration DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/GKSFZ
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Systematic Reviews |
| Publication status | Submitted - 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- water scarcity
- water insecurity
- WASH
- social work
- Sustainable Development Goals
- SDG 6
- climate adaptation
- environmental justice
- transdisciplinary practice
- community resilience
- scoping review
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Social work interventions for water insecurity: a scoping review protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS