Students' understanding of geometry terminology through the lens of Van Hiele theory

Jogymol Alex, Kuttikkattu J. Mammen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

After a long six-year lapse, the Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement introduced in 2012 included geometry as part of the South African Grade 12 Mathematics Paper 2. The first cohort of matriculation students wrote Paper 2 in 2014. This article reports on the understanding of geometry terminology with which a group of 154 first-year mathematics education students entered a rural South African university in 2015; 126 volunteered to be part of the study. Responses to a 60-item multiple-choice questionnaire (30 verbally presented and 30 visually presented items) in geometry terminology provided the data for the study. A concept's verbal description should be associated with its correct visual image. Van Hiele theory provided the lens for the study. An overall percentage mean score of 64% obtained in the test indicated that the majority of the students had a fairly good knowledge of basic geometry terminology. The students obtained a percentage mean score of 68% on visually presented items against that of 59% on verbally presented items implying a lower level thinking as per Van Hiele theory. The findings of this study imply a combination approach using visual and verbal representations to enhance conceptual understanding in geometry. This has to be complemented and supplemented through scaffolding to fill student teachers' content gap.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbera376
JournalPythagoras
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Mathematics
  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Students' understanding of geometry terminology through the lens of Van Hiele theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this