TY - JOUR
T1 - Sulfonylureas in the Current Practice of Type 2 Diabetes Management
T2 - Are They All the Same? Consensus from the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries Advisory Board on Sulfonylureas
AU - Al-Saleh, Yousef
AU - Sabico, Shaun
AU - Al-Furqani, Ahmed
AU - Jayyousi, Amin
AU - Alromaihi, Dalal
AU - Ba-Essa, Ebtesam
AU - Alawadi, Fatheya
AU - Alkaabi, Juma
AU - Hassanein, Mohamed
AU - Al-Sifri, Saud
AU - Saleh, Seham
AU - Alessa, Thamer
AU - Al-Daghri, Nasser M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Since their inception in the commercial market in the mid-twentieth century, sulfonylureas (SUs) have remained a therapeutic option in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Despite their established glucose-lowering effects, there is no consensus among global experts and modern guidelines regarding the priority of SUs in relation to other therapeutic options, given the lack of evidence that SUs are associated with a low risk of macrovascular events and excess mortality. However, findings from recent trials and real-time observations have resolved this contentious issue somewhat, albeit to varying degrees. The present consensus discusses the role of SUs in contemporary diabetes management in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Regional experts from these countries gathered virtually to formulate a consensus following presentations of topics relevant to SU therapy with an emphasis on gliclazide, including long-term efficacy, cost, end-organ benefits, and side effects, based on up-to-date evidence. The present narrative review reflects the conclusions of this assembly and provides a platform upon which future guidelines for the use of SUs in the GCC can be tailored.
AB - Since their inception in the commercial market in the mid-twentieth century, sulfonylureas (SUs) have remained a therapeutic option in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Despite their established glucose-lowering effects, there is no consensus among global experts and modern guidelines regarding the priority of SUs in relation to other therapeutic options, given the lack of evidence that SUs are associated with a low risk of macrovascular events and excess mortality. However, findings from recent trials and real-time observations have resolved this contentious issue somewhat, albeit to varying degrees. The present consensus discusses the role of SUs in contemporary diabetes management in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Regional experts from these countries gathered virtually to formulate a consensus following presentations of topics relevant to SU therapy with an emphasis on gliclazide, including long-term efficacy, cost, end-organ benefits, and side effects, based on up-to-date evidence. The present narrative review reflects the conclusions of this assembly and provides a platform upon which future guidelines for the use of SUs in the GCC can be tailored.
KW - Gliclazide
KW - Middle East
KW - Sulfonylurea
KW - Type 2 diabetes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105960488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105960488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13300-021-01059-1
DO - 10.1007/s13300-021-01059-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85105960488
SN - 1869-6953
VL - 12
SP - 2115
EP - 2132
JO - Diabetes Therapy
JF - Diabetes Therapy
IS - 8
ER -