TY - JOUR
T1 - Synthesis, α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition and molecular docking studies of indazole derivatives
AU - Nawaz, Muhammad
AU - Taha, Muhammad
AU - Qureshi, Faiza
AU - Ullah, Nisar
AU - Selvaraj, Manikandan
AU - Shahzad, Sumaira
AU - Chigurupati, Sridevi
AU - Abubshait, Samar A.
AU - Ahmad, Tauqir
AU - Chinnam, Sampath
AU - Hisaindee, Soleiman
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU) (project number: 2019-126-DSR). Authors would like to express their gratitude towards the Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC) at IAU for the laboratory support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Herein, we report the synthesis and inhibitory potential of indazole (Methyl 1H-indazole-4-carboxylate) derivatives (1–13) against α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes. The described derivatives demonstrated good inhibitory potential with IC50 values, ranging between 15.04 ± 0.05 to 76.70 ± 0.06 µM ± SEM for α-amylase and 16.99 ± 0.19 to 77.97 ± 0.19 µM ± SEM for α-glucosidase, respectively. In particular, compounds (8–10 and 12) displayed significant inhibitory activities against both the screened enzymes, with their inhibitory potential comparable to the standard acarbose (12.98 ± 0.03 and 12.79 ± 0.17 µM ± SEM, respectively). Additionally, the influence of different substituents on enzyme inhibition activities was assessed to study the structure activity relationships. Molecular docking simulations were performed to rationalize the binding of derivatives/compounds with enzymes. All the synthesized derivatives (1–13) were characterized with the aid of spectroscopic instruments such as 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, HR-MS, elemental analysis and FTIR. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.
AB - Herein, we report the synthesis and inhibitory potential of indazole (Methyl 1H-indazole-4-carboxylate) derivatives (1–13) against α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes. The described derivatives demonstrated good inhibitory potential with IC50 values, ranging between 15.04 ± 0.05 to 76.70 ± 0.06 µM ± SEM for α-amylase and 16.99 ± 0.19 to 77.97 ± 0.19 µM ± SEM for α-glucosidase, respectively. In particular, compounds (8–10 and 12) displayed significant inhibitory activities against both the screened enzymes, with their inhibitory potential comparable to the standard acarbose (12.98 ± 0.03 and 12.79 ± 0.17 µM ± SEM, respectively). Additionally, the influence of different substituents on enzyme inhibition activities was assessed to study the structure activity relationships. Molecular docking simulations were performed to rationalize the binding of derivatives/compounds with enzymes. All the synthesized derivatives (1–13) were characterized with the aid of spectroscopic instruments such as 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, HR-MS, elemental analysis and FTIR. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.
KW - FTIR
KW - HR-MS
KW - Indazole
KW - NMR
KW - molecular docking
KW - spectral studies
KW - α-amylase activity
KW - α-glucosidase activity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113380920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85113380920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07391102.2021.1947892
DO - 10.1080/07391102.2021.1947892
M3 - Article
C2 - 34463216
AN - SCOPUS:85113380920
SN - 0739-1102
VL - 40
SP - 10730
EP - 10740
JO - Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
JF - Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
IS - 21
ER -