The 14th Amendment in the Supreme Court's Plessy 1 and Brown 2 Decisions and Influences on Editorial Arguments about Segregation in the Southern United States, 1960–1964

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A content analysis of the editorial pages of the Birmingham News from 1960 to 1964 shows that, despite its staunch segregationist stance, the paper's editorial pages, nonetheless, produced strong integrationist narratives. This paradox was borne of discordant interpretations of 14th Amendment rights featured in the Supreme Court's Plessy (1896) and Brown (1954) decisions. Rise of staunch segregationist groups and officials after the Court's 1954 Brown decision drove News editors to embrace greater democratic pluralism. The evolution in editorial approach corresponded to the paper's gradual adoption of Brown's interpretations of 14th Amendment rights. Change in the valence of the paper's narratives supports Condit’s (1987) thesis that rhetorical “crafting” of public morality about race brought about greater tolerance and acceptance of racial equality in America.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-83
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Communication Inquiry
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2023

Keywords

  • crafting of public morality
  • cultural production
  • culture and communication
  • journalism and democracy
  • legal and ethical issues
  • pluralism
  • race

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Communication
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The 14th Amendment in the Supreme Court's Plessy 1 and Brown 2 Decisions and Influences on Editorial Arguments about Segregation in the Southern United States, 1960–1964'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this