TY - JOUR
T1 - The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 prophylaxis
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
AU - GUIDE Group
AU - Lewis, Kimberley
AU - Chaudhuri, Dipayan
AU - Alshamsi, Fayez
AU - Carayannopoulos, Laiya
AU - Dearness, Karin
AU - Chagla, Zain
AU - Alhazzani, Waleed
AU - Bellie-Cote, Emilie
AU - Soth, Mark
AU - Jaeschke, Roman
AU - Sharma, Sunjay
AU - Dionne, Joanna
AU - Centofanti, John
AU - Oszkowski, Simon
AU - Baw, Bandar
AU - Junek, Mats
AU - Szczeklik, Wojtek
AU - Kasper, Ekkehard
AU - Rochwerg, Bram
AU - Moller, Morten Hylander
AU - Alsharahni, Mohammed
AU - Alquraini, Mustafa
AU - Duan, Eric
AU - Muagbaw, Lawrence
AU - Lau, Vincent
AU - Hornamand, Kimia
AU - Thabane, Lehana
AU - Guyatt, Gordon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2021 Lewis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Background Populations such as healthcare workers (HCW) that are unable to practice physical distancing are at high risk of acquiring Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). In these cases pharmacological prophylaxis would be a solution to reduce severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2) transmission. Hydroxychloroquine has in vitro antiviral properties against SARS CoV-2. We therefore sought to determine the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine as prophylaxis for COVID-19. Methods and findings We electronically searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane COVID-19 Register of Controlled Trials, Epistemonikos COVID-19, clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform up to September 28th, 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We calculated pooled relative risks (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effect model. We identified four RCTs (n = 4921) that met our eligibility criteria. The use of hydroxychloroquine, compared to placebo, did not reduce the risks of developing COVID-19 (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.04, moderate certainty), hospitalization (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.50, moderate certainty), or mortality (RR 3.26, 95% CI 0.13 to 79.74, low certainty), however, hydroxychloroquine use increased the risk of adverse events (RR 2.76, 95% CI 1.38 to 5.55, moderate certainty). Conclusion Although pharmacologic prophylaxis is an attractive preventive strategy against COVID-19, the current body of evidence failed to show clinical benefit for prophylactic hydroxychloroquine and showed a higher risk of adverse events when compared to placebo or no prophylaxis.
AB - Background Populations such as healthcare workers (HCW) that are unable to practice physical distancing are at high risk of acquiring Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). In these cases pharmacological prophylaxis would be a solution to reduce severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2) transmission. Hydroxychloroquine has in vitro antiviral properties against SARS CoV-2. We therefore sought to determine the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine as prophylaxis for COVID-19. Methods and findings We electronically searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane COVID-19 Register of Controlled Trials, Epistemonikos COVID-19, clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform up to September 28th, 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We calculated pooled relative risks (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effect model. We identified four RCTs (n = 4921) that met our eligibility criteria. The use of hydroxychloroquine, compared to placebo, did not reduce the risks of developing COVID-19 (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.04, moderate certainty), hospitalization (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.50, moderate certainty), or mortality (RR 3.26, 95% CI 0.13 to 79.74, low certainty), however, hydroxychloroquine use increased the risk of adverse events (RR 2.76, 95% CI 1.38 to 5.55, moderate certainty). Conclusion Although pharmacologic prophylaxis is an attractive preventive strategy against COVID-19, the current body of evidence failed to show clinical benefit for prophylactic hydroxychloroquine and showed a higher risk of adverse events when compared to placebo or no prophylaxis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099444346&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099444346&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0244778
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0244778
M3 - Article
C2 - 33406138
AN - SCOPUS:85099444346
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 16
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 1
M1 - e0244778
ER -