TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of urologists in the management of urological injuries during obstetric and gynaecologic surgery
AU - Hammad, Fayez T.
AU - Al Qaiwani, Khaled M.
AU - Shirodkar, Samir S.
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - Introduction and hypothesis: We investigated the role of urologists in the management of urological injuries (UI) during obstetric and gynaecological (Ob & Gyn) surgery in a setup where endourological facilities were available intraoperatively. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all such cases between January 2000 and December 2005. Results: Out of 13,010 procedures, urologists were involved in 98 patients (prophylactic ureteric stenting (n=29) and involvement after the occurrence or suspicion of UI (n= 69)). There were 43 injuries (bladder, n=32; ureter, n=11). Four bladder and 10 ureteric injuries were only identified using endourological procedures. The incidence of UI in caesarean sections (lower segment caesarean sections (LSCS)) was higher than other procedures (0.46% vs. 0.19%, P<0.01). There was no difference in the incidence of injuries in emergency vs. elective LSCS (0.42% vs. 0.65%, P=0.24). Conclusions: The availability of endourological facilities in the Ob & Gyn operating room facilitated the identification and management of UI especially ureteric injuries.
AB - Introduction and hypothesis: We investigated the role of urologists in the management of urological injuries (UI) during obstetric and gynaecological (Ob & Gyn) surgery in a setup where endourological facilities were available intraoperatively. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all such cases between January 2000 and December 2005. Results: Out of 13,010 procedures, urologists were involved in 98 patients (prophylactic ureteric stenting (n=29) and involvement after the occurrence or suspicion of UI (n= 69)). There were 43 injuries (bladder, n=32; ureter, n=11). Four bladder and 10 ureteric injuries were only identified using endourological procedures. The incidence of UI in caesarean sections (lower segment caesarean sections (LSCS)) was higher than other procedures (0.46% vs. 0.19%, P<0.01). There was no difference in the incidence of injuries in emergency vs. elective LSCS (0.42% vs. 0.65%, P=0.24). Conclusions: The availability of endourological facilities in the Ob & Gyn operating room facilitated the identification and management of UI especially ureteric injuries.
KW - Obstetric and gynaecological procedures
KW - Urological injuries
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956483902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956483902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00192-010-1173-6
DO - 10.1007/s00192-010-1173-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 20458464
AN - SCOPUS:77956483902
SN - 0937-3462
VL - 21
SP - 1237
EP - 1241
JO - International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
JF - International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
IS - 10
ER -