TY - JOUR
T1 - Transcranial magnetic stimulation has no placebo effect on motor learning
AU - Jelić, Milan B.
AU - Stevanović, Vuk B.
AU - Milanović, Sladjan D.
AU - Ljubisavljević, Miloš R.
AU - Filipović, Saša R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Grant (Project No. 175012 ) from the Ministry for Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia .
PY - 2013/8
Y1 - 2013/8
N2 - Objective: Motor learning is the core cognitive function in neurorehabilitation and in various other skill-training activities (e.g. sport, music). Therefore, there is an increasing interest in the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) methods for its enhancement. However, although usually assumed, a potential placebo effect of TMS methods on motor learning has never been systematically investigated. Methods: Improvement of performance on the Purdue Pegboard Task over three test-blocks (T0, T1, and T2), separated by >20. min, was used to evaluate motor learning. In Experiment-1, two groups of 10 participants each were compared: one group immediately before T1 received a sham intermittent theta burst stimulation procedure (P-iTBS group), while another did not have any intervention at all (control - CON group). In Experiment-2, a third group of participants (six subjects) who received sham high-frequency repetitive TMS procedure before T1 (P-rTMS group) was compared with P-iTBS group. Results: All three groups showed significant learning over time, but without any difference between them, either in Experiment-1 between P-iTBS and CON, or in Experiment-2 between P-rTMS and P-iTBS. Conclusion: The results suggest lack of any placebo effect of TMS on motor learning. Significance: The results may help in designing further TMS-motor learning studies and in interpreting their results.
AB - Objective: Motor learning is the core cognitive function in neurorehabilitation and in various other skill-training activities (e.g. sport, music). Therefore, there is an increasing interest in the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) methods for its enhancement. However, although usually assumed, a potential placebo effect of TMS methods on motor learning has never been systematically investigated. Methods: Improvement of performance on the Purdue Pegboard Task over three test-blocks (T0, T1, and T2), separated by >20. min, was used to evaluate motor learning. In Experiment-1, two groups of 10 participants each were compared: one group immediately before T1 received a sham intermittent theta burst stimulation procedure (P-iTBS group), while another did not have any intervention at all (control - CON group). In Experiment-2, a third group of participants (six subjects) who received sham high-frequency repetitive TMS procedure before T1 (P-rTMS group) was compared with P-iTBS group. Results: All three groups showed significant learning over time, but without any difference between them, either in Experiment-1 between P-iTBS and CON, or in Experiment-2 between P-rTMS and P-iTBS. Conclusion: The results suggest lack of any placebo effect of TMS on motor learning. Significance: The results may help in designing further TMS-motor learning studies and in interpreting their results.
KW - Brain plasticity
KW - Motor learning
KW - Neurorehabilitation
KW - Placebo
KW - Purdue pegboard
KW - Transcranial magnetic stimulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880156287&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880156287&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.02.024
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.02.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 23562657
AN - SCOPUS:84880156287
SN - 1388-2457
VL - 124
SP - 1646
EP - 1651
JO - Clinical Neurophysiology
JF - Clinical Neurophysiology
IS - 8
ER -