TY - JOUR
T1 - Transdiagnostic relevance of subjective cognitive complaints
T2 - a validation and population-based study using two Canadian scales (SSTICS and MoCA) in the UAE
AU - Al Mugaddam, Fadwa
AU - Abdel-Aziz, Karim
AU - Javaid, Syed Fahad
AU - Nauman, Javaid
AU - ElBarazi, Iffat
AU - Stip, Emmanuel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Al Mugaddam, Abdel-Aziz, Javaid, Nauman, ElBarazi and Stip.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Cognitive disorders span several diagnostic categories in psychiatry, but subjective cognitive complaints (SCC) remain underutilized in transdiagnostic assessments, particularly in Arab contexts. These difficulties can also be present in Affective disorder illnesses are assessed using neuropsychological tests. Self-assessments are useful for understanding difficulties from the user’s perspective. The Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia (SSTICS) is a rating scale designed to measure subjective cognitive complaints in persons with schizophrenia. This study explores the SSTIC-E, a culturally adapted tool, highlighting its cross-diagnostic relevance over simple psychometric validation. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 210 participants (126 patients, 84 controls) in the United Arab Emirates. Patients met ICD-10/DSM-5 criteria for schizophrenia spectrum disorders and affective disorders, in addition to other psychiatric disorders. The instruments included the SSTIC-E and the MoCA. Analysis focused on internal consistency, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and transdiagnostic comparisons. Results: Patients reported higher SSTIC-E scores than controls (mean = 34.06 vs. 22.55, p < 0.001). MoCA scores confirmed decreased objective performance in patients (mean = 22.71 vs. 27.19, p < 0.001). The SSTIC-E has excellent reliability (α = 0.89). No significant differences were observed in SCCs between the schizophrenia and affective disorder groups. CFA analysis confirmed a one-factor model with residual item correlations (CFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.058). Women reported higher SCC; age had no effect. Discussion: The SSTIC-E demonstrates utility beyond diagnostic silos, providing a valuable and culturally relevant instrument for transdiagnostic psychiatric assessment in Arabic-speaking populations. Schizophrenia exhibited slightly higher SCC compared to patients with affective disorders, with a lack of clear association between subjective and objective cognition. SCC is common across psychiatric diagnoses in the United Arab Emirates, supporting a dimensional model of cognitive dysfunction. SSTIC-E reveals insights into the lived experiences of patients not captured by objective tests. Cultural and gender influences underscore the necessity of context-specific approaches.
AB - Background: Cognitive disorders span several diagnostic categories in psychiatry, but subjective cognitive complaints (SCC) remain underutilized in transdiagnostic assessments, particularly in Arab contexts. These difficulties can also be present in Affective disorder illnesses are assessed using neuropsychological tests. Self-assessments are useful for understanding difficulties from the user’s perspective. The Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia (SSTICS) is a rating scale designed to measure subjective cognitive complaints in persons with schizophrenia. This study explores the SSTIC-E, a culturally adapted tool, highlighting its cross-diagnostic relevance over simple psychometric validation. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 210 participants (126 patients, 84 controls) in the United Arab Emirates. Patients met ICD-10/DSM-5 criteria for schizophrenia spectrum disorders and affective disorders, in addition to other psychiatric disorders. The instruments included the SSTIC-E and the MoCA. Analysis focused on internal consistency, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and transdiagnostic comparisons. Results: Patients reported higher SSTIC-E scores than controls (mean = 34.06 vs. 22.55, p < 0.001). MoCA scores confirmed decreased objective performance in patients (mean = 22.71 vs. 27.19, p < 0.001). The SSTIC-E has excellent reliability (α = 0.89). No significant differences were observed in SCCs between the schizophrenia and affective disorder groups. CFA analysis confirmed a one-factor model with residual item correlations (CFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.058). Women reported higher SCC; age had no effect. Discussion: The SSTIC-E demonstrates utility beyond diagnostic silos, providing a valuable and culturally relevant instrument for transdiagnostic psychiatric assessment in Arabic-speaking populations. Schizophrenia exhibited slightly higher SCC compared to patients with affective disorders, with a lack of clear association between subjective and objective cognition. SCC is common across psychiatric diagnoses in the United Arab Emirates, supporting a dimensional model of cognitive dysfunction. SSTIC-E reveals insights into the lived experiences of patients not captured by objective tests. Cultural and gender influences underscore the necessity of context-specific approaches.
KW - MOCA
KW - SSTICS
KW - affective disorder
KW - cognition
KW - schizophrenia
KW - subjective cognitive complains
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105023655881
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105023655881#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1677371
DO - 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1677371
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105023655881
SN - 1662-5153
VL - 19
JO - Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
M1 - 1677371
ER -