Urologic injuries in the Gulf War

F. M. Abu-Zidan, A. Al-Tawheed, Y. M. Ali

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)


This study aims to compare the urologic injuries treated at Kuwait during the Gulf War with those recently reported by the United States urologic surgeons. Gunshot caused the majority of the injuries (58%) on our side of the battle compared with fragmentation injuries (83%) on the other side. We had statistically significant higher renal and ureteric injuries (14/35 compared with 5/30; p<0.04, Chi-square). This difference can be explained by the use of the flak jackets on the other side or the difference of the type of weapons used. Our management had a similar preservative approach. Only 4/12 of renal injuries (33%) had nephrectomy. Two ureteric injuries were missed by general surgeons which were successfully managed by the urologists. This study supports the presence of urologists within military surgical teams.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)577-583
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Urology and Nephrology
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology
  • Urology


Dive into the research topics of 'Urologic injuries in the Gulf War'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this