Abstract
United States farmers typically spend over $10 billion annually on commercial fertilizer. Chemical inputs such as nitrogen (N) are essential for maintaining crop yields; however, farmers often apply excessive N inputs as an insurance policy. Nitrogen fertilizer consumption in the U.S. quadrupled from 3 million metric tons in 1961 to over 12 million metric tons in 2004, and per ha N fertilizer use quadrupled. Increase in N use has been associated with the impairment of U.S. streams, lakes, and aquifers. The objective of this research study was to develop an integrated farm-level economic/environmental risk framework for trade-off analysis between farm profitability and environmental externalities (impacts). Results indicated that there was no single point of optimal trade-off between farm profitability and the environment. Additionally, trade-offs between farm profit and environmental impacts varied signifcantly depending on the choice of cropping or tillage system.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 73-89 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Air, Soil and Water Research |
| Volume | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- Environmental impacts
- Nitrogen
- Optimization
- Response surface method
- Trade-off analysis
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Environmental Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Using response surface methodology for economic and environmental trade-offs at the farm level'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS