Validating the GO-FAR score: predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in the Middle East

David O. Alao, Yaman Hukan, Nada Mohammed, Kinza Moin, Resshme K. Sudha, Arif Alper Cevik, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction and aim: External validations of the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) score have been in populations where Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) is practised. We aim to externally validate the GO-FAR score in a population without a DNAR order. Methods: We studied patients ≥ 18 years old who had an In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) with known outcomes at Al Ain Hospital from January 2017 to December 2019, excluding those who died in the emergency department. Studied variables included demography, location, response time, code duration, initial rhythm, primary diagnosis, admission vital signs, GO FAR score variables, discharge status, and functional outcomes as determined by the cerebral performance category score ranging from 1 (good cerebral performance) to 5 (brain death). Results: 366 patients were studied; 66.7% were males. The median (IQR) age was 70 (55–81) years. Cardiac and respiratory causes were the primary diagnoses in 89 (24.6%) and 67 (18.5%), respectively. IHCA occurred in critical areas such as the intensive care unit, high dependency unit and coronary care unit in 206 (80.8%) patients. The majority, 308 (91.8%), had a non-shockable rhythm, and a return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 159 (43.4%) of the patients. Thirty-one (8.5%) patients survived to hospital discharge, and 20 (5.5%) patients had cerebral performance category scores of 1 and 2. The area under the curve of the ROC for survival to discharge with good functional outcome was 0.74 (95% CI 0.59–0.88). The best cut-off point for predicting survival with a good neurological outcome was a GO-FAR score of < 4, having a sensitivity of 0.81, a specificity of 0.7, a positive likelihood ratio of 2.7 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.27. Conclusions: A GO-FAR score of less than 4 predicts survival with a good neurological outcome in a healthcare system with an all-inclusive patient population with no DNAR practice.

Original languageEnglish
Article number161
JournalInternational Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validating the GO-FAR score: predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in the Middle East'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this