Validation of the Cummings' risk score; How well does it identify women with high risk of hip fracture: The Tromsø Study

Luai A. Ahmed, Henrik Schirmer, Vinjar Fønnebø, Ragnar M. Joakimsen, Gro K. Berntsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We examined a two-step case-finding strategy where the Cummings' risk score (NEJM 1995) was applied in a population-based setting together with bone mineral density (BMD) measurements in order to validate its ability to identify women with high risk of hip fracture. Methods: All Tromsø women aged between 65 and 74 were invited to the Tromsø Osteoporosis Study (TROST) together with a 5% random sample of women aged 75-84 years (n = 1410). All had forearm BMD measurements in 1994/95 and were followed for 5 years with respect to first hip fracture. A risk score was constructed matching the Cummings score as closely as possible. Results: In all 759, 578 and 73 women had 0-2, 3-4 and 5+ risk factors, respectively. Women with 5+ risk factors had a 5-year hip fracture risk of 11% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-18.2%). BMD screening applied to these women identified 74% of them as osteoporotic and 19% as osteopenic with, respectively, 5-year hip fracture risk of 13% and 7.1%. Conclusion: In a population different from the one the score was generated in, this simple risk score identifies a group of women with high risk of hip fractures. With no additional BMD measurements, those high-risk women could benefit from early intervention measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)815-822
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Epidemiology
Volume21
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bone mineral density
  • Hip fractures
  • Risk score
  • T-score

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of the Cummings' risk score; How well does it identify women with high risk of hip fracture: The Tromsø Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this