TY - JOUR
T1 - Whole-cell and acellular pertussis vaccination programs and rates of pertussis among infants and young children
AU - Vickers, David
AU - Ross, Allen G.
AU - Mainar-Jaime, Raúl C.
AU - Neudorf, Cordell
AU - Shah, Syed
PY - 2006/11/7
Y1 - 2006/11/7
N2 - Background: The transition from a whole-cell to a 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine provided a unique opportunity to compare the effect that each type of vaccine had on the incidence of pertussis, under routine conditions, among children less than 10 years of age. Methods: Analyses were based on passive surveillance data collected between 1995 and 2005. The incidence of pertussis by year and birth cohort was compiled according to age during the surveillance period. We determined the association between vaccine type (whole-cell, acellular or a combination of both) and the incidence of pertussis using Poisson regression analysis after controlling for age (< 1 year, 1-4 years and 5-9 years) and vaccination history (i.e., partial or complete). Results: During 7 of the 11 years surveyed, infants (< 1 year of age) had the highest incidence of pertussis. Among children born after 1997, when acellular vaccines were introduced, the rates of pertussis were highest among infants and preschool children (1-4 years of age). Poisson regression analysis revealed that, in the group given either the whole-cell vaccine or a combination of both vaccines, the incidence of pertussis was lower among infants and preschool children than among school-aged children (5-9 years). The reverse was true in the group given only an acellular vaccine, with a higher incidence among infants and preschool children than among school-aged children. Interpretation: These results suggest that current immunization practices may not be adequate in protecting infants and children less than 5 years of age against pertussis. Altering available acellular formulations or adopting immunization practices used in some European countries may increase the clinical effectiveness of routine pertussis vaccination programs among infants and preschool children.
AB - Background: The transition from a whole-cell to a 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine provided a unique opportunity to compare the effect that each type of vaccine had on the incidence of pertussis, under routine conditions, among children less than 10 years of age. Methods: Analyses were based on passive surveillance data collected between 1995 and 2005. The incidence of pertussis by year and birth cohort was compiled according to age during the surveillance period. We determined the association between vaccine type (whole-cell, acellular or a combination of both) and the incidence of pertussis using Poisson regression analysis after controlling for age (< 1 year, 1-4 years and 5-9 years) and vaccination history (i.e., partial or complete). Results: During 7 of the 11 years surveyed, infants (< 1 year of age) had the highest incidence of pertussis. Among children born after 1997, when acellular vaccines were introduced, the rates of pertussis were highest among infants and preschool children (1-4 years of age). Poisson regression analysis revealed that, in the group given either the whole-cell vaccine or a combination of both vaccines, the incidence of pertussis was lower among infants and preschool children than among school-aged children (5-9 years). The reverse was true in the group given only an acellular vaccine, with a higher incidence among infants and preschool children than among school-aged children. Interpretation: These results suggest that current immunization practices may not be adequate in protecting infants and children less than 5 years of age against pertussis. Altering available acellular formulations or adopting immunization practices used in some European countries may increase the clinical effectiveness of routine pertussis vaccination programs among infants and preschool children.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751233861&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751233861&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1503/cmaj.051637
DO - 10.1503/cmaj.051637
M3 - Article
C2 - 17098950
AN - SCOPUS:33751233861
SN - 0008-4409
VL - 175
SP - 1213
EP - 1217
JO - Canadian Medical Association Journal
JF - Canadian Medical Association Journal
IS - 10
ER -