Zirconium vs. hafnium: A comparative study of mesoporous MOF stability

Orysia Zaremba; Subhajit Dutta; Jesus Requies; Jacopo Andreo; Stefan Wuttke

doi:10.1039/d4cc03103b

Zirconium vs. hafnium: A comparative study of mesoporous MOF stability

Orysia Zaremba
, Subhajit Dutta
, Jesus Requies
, Jacopo Andreo
, Stefan Wuttke

Department of Chemistry

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A wide range of mesoporous Zr and Hf metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), namely MIP-206, MOF-808, and NU-1000, as well as the microporous UiO-66, were systematically investigated and compared in terms of thermal and chemical stability. The holistic effects of metal type (Zr vs. Hf), linker type (small and rigid vs. large and flexible), and framework topology (2D vs. 3D) on the overall framework stability were investigated.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2794-2797
Number of pages	4
Journal	Chemical Communications
Volume	61
Issue number	13
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1039/d4cc03103b
Publication status	Published - Jan 8 2025

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Catalysis
Ceramics and Composites
General Chemistry
Surfaces, Coatings and Films
Metals and Alloys
Materials Chemistry

Access to Document

10.1039/d4cc03103b

Cite this

@article{cca67fef16d84ff89643fd345863bcf0,

title = "Zirconium vs. hafnium: A comparative study of mesoporous MOF stability",

abstract = "A wide range of mesoporous Zr and Hf metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), namely MIP-206, MOF-808, and NU-1000, as well as the microporous UiO-66, were systematically investigated and compared in terms of thermal and chemical stability. The holistic effects of metal type (Zr vs. Hf), linker type (small and rigid vs. large and flexible), and framework topology (2D vs. 3D) on the overall framework stability were investigated.",

author = "Orysia Zaremba and Subhajit Dutta and Jesus Requies and Jacopo Andreo and Stefan Wuttke",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025.",

year = "2025",

month = jan,

day = "8",

doi = "10.1039/d4cc03103b",

language = "English",

volume = "61",

pages = "2794--2797",

journal = "Chemical Communications",

issn = "1359-7345",

publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry",

number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Zirconium vs. hafnium

T2 - A comparative study of mesoporous MOF stability

AU - Zaremba, Orysia

AU - Dutta, Subhajit

AU - Requies, Jesus

AU - Andreo, Jacopo

AU - Wuttke, Stefan

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025.

PY - 2025/1/8

Y1 - 2025/1/8

N2 - A wide range of mesoporous Zr and Hf metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), namely MIP-206, MOF-808, and NU-1000, as well as the microporous UiO-66, were systematically investigated and compared in terms of thermal and chemical stability. The holistic effects of metal type (Zr vs. Hf), linker type (small and rigid vs. large and flexible), and framework topology (2D vs. 3D) on the overall framework stability were investigated.

AB - A wide range of mesoporous Zr and Hf metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), namely MIP-206, MOF-808, and NU-1000, as well as the microporous UiO-66, were systematically investigated and compared in terms of thermal and chemical stability. The holistic effects of metal type (Zr vs. Hf), linker type (small and rigid vs. large and flexible), and framework topology (2D vs. 3D) on the overall framework stability were investigated.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85215616569

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85215616569#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1039/d4cc03103b

DO - 10.1039/d4cc03103b

M3 - Article

C2 - 39835374

AN - SCOPUS:85215616569

SN - 1359-7345

VL - 61

SP - 2794

EP - 2797

JO - Chemical Communications

JF - Chemical Communications

IS - 13

ER -

Zirconium vs. hafnium: A comparative study of mesoporous MOF stability

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this